'); //-->
Home
Help

Archives

Related Coverage

Panel urges wide change in Fire Department

The Report
The Challenge: Managing Tradition, Diversity, and Change


Prior Coverage
Part 1:
'Tradition' and culture costing Boston millions of dollars

Job satisfaction
Cast in heroic role, firefighters bask in public acceptance

Disability
Lingering injuries
strain budget, patience


Part II:
Traditional ways trample on women and minority goups

Minority hiring
Some dubious
applicant designations

San Francisco
Change at the top is a crowning achievement


Part III:
Turf war a threat
to emergancy aid


Sections
Boston Globe Online: Page One
Nation | World
Metro | Region
Business
Sports
Living | Arts
Editorials

Weekly
Health | Science (Tue.)
Food (Wed.)
Calendar (Thu.)
Life at Home (Thu.)

Sunday
Automotive
Focus
Learning
Magazine
Real Estate
Travel

Local news
City Weekly
South Weekly
Globe West
North Weekly
NorthWest Weekly
NH Weekly

Features
Globe archives
Book Reviews
Book Swap
Columns
Comics
Crossword
Horoscopes
Death Notices
Lottery
Movie Reviews
Music Reviews
NetWatch weblog
Obituaries
Special Reports
Today's stories A-Z
TV & Radio
Weather

Classifieds
Autos
BostonWorks
Real Estate
Place an Ad


Buy a Globe photo

Help
E-mail addresses
Send us feedback

Alternative views
Low-graphics version
Acrobat version (.pdf)


The Boston Globe OnlineBoston.com Boston Globe Online / Metro | Region / A Department Under Fire

Final Report of the Boston Fire Department Review Commission

8 Resource Allocation

8.1 Introduction

Table of Contents

Introduction
1.1 A Personal Note from the

Boston Fire Department
Review Commission
1.2 Members of the Boston Fire
Department Review
Commission
1.3 Background of the
Commission
1.4 How the Commission
Gathered Information
1.5 Recommendations
1.6 Acknowledgments

Culture and Leadership
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Environment
2.3 Communication
2.4 Confidence
2.5 Recommendations

Discipline
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Application and Enforcement
3.3 Accountability
3.4 Training
3.5 Culture
3.6 Recommendations

Supervision and Training
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Supervision
4.2.1 The "Acting List" and

Acting Out of Grade
4.2.2 Schedule
4.3 Training
4.3.1 Senior Management
Training
4.3.2 Supervisory and Station
Level Training
4.4 Recommendations

Department Administration
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Commissioner and Chief of

Department
5.3 Senior Management
5.4 Community Firefighting
5.5 Equipment and Training
5.6 Capital Planning
5.7 Fire Station Inspection and
Maintenance
5.8 Technology
5.9 Physical Fitness and
Wellness Programs
5.10 Equipment Maintenance
5.11 Recommendations

Personnel and Human Resources
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Discriminatfon and Sexual

Harassment
6.3 Department Composition
6.3.1 Fire Alarm and
Construction Division
6.3.2 Recruitment and Gender
Representation
6.4 Promotions
6.5 Education
6.6 Injuries and Disability
6.6.1 Supervision and
Accountability
6.6.2 Modified or Light Duty
6.6.3 Disability Retirement
6.6.4 Annual Physical
Examinations
6.7 Recommendations

Drug Testing
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Current Procedures
7.3 Substance Abuse and

Discipline
7.4 Recommendation

Resource Allocation
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Marine Unit
8.3 Existing Fire Brigade at

Long Island
8.4 Fire Alarm Call Boxes
8.5 Recommendations

Implementation and Planning
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Chief of Planning and

Technology
9.3 Chief of Administration
9.4 Chief of Operations
9.5 Accreditation and Strategic
Planning
9.6 Recommendations

Summary of Recommendations
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Culture and Leadership
10.3 Discipline
10.4 Supervision and Training
10.5 Department Administration
10.6 Personnel and Human

Resources
10.7 Drug Testing
10.8 Resource Allocation
10.9 Implementation and
Planning
There have been a number of criticisms relative to the Department's allocation of resources. Some of the allegations of abuse of Department resources and inappropriate use of personnel are best left for a new management team to explore as part of a comprehensive review of the Department's operations. However, other criticisms as they relate to the operation of the Department are appropriately addressed in this forum. In particular, there have been calls for the abolition of the existing fire alarm call boxes, and the extensive network needed to maintain the system. Further, complaints surfaced relative to a manned operation on Long Island, and questions have been raised regarding the necessity and operation of a Marine Unit. The Commission questioned Department officials at length regarding these topics, and we have concluded that further review is necessary before the Commission could recommend that certain operations be eliminated. However, in advance of such a review, there are issues that should be addressed relative to these operations.

8.2 Marine Unit

The Commission agrees with several Department officials who argued that increased development on the waterfront justifies the presence of a marine unit. However, the Commission finds that a marine unit would be better served if it had both a land-based and water-based presence. As part of the development of the South Boston waterfront, the Department should review the possibility of establishing a marine unit in a new station house that will serve both the extensive land development planned in the area, along with the necessary presence of firefighting apparatus in the harbor. In this plan, one team could perform both land and water based roles. This would increase the efficiency of such a unit, and justify the expense of maintenance of a water-based firefighting presence on the harbor. This is also an area that may provide the Department with possibilities for public/private partnerships or state or federal grants. The Department should explore these avenues wherever possible. Finally, it was suggested to the Commission that the current location for the marine unit would be attractive to private development. The Department and the City should explore how the proceeds of this property might benefit the relocation of the marine unit.

8.3 Existing Fire Brigade at Long Island

The Commission reviewed concerns raised relative to the continued existence of a manned fire station on Long Island. Currently, Long Island houses several City agencies, and its tenancy has increased in recent years. Many of the buildings are not equipped with sprinklers. As of November 1999, there were 1,035 clients and staff who work or live at the Long Island Campus of the Boston Public Health Commission. In addition, an ongoing renovation project in the administration building is scheduled to be completed shortly. The renovated space will house two new programs, an adolescent service and an adult detoxification program. It is anticipated that these programs will increase daily usage to approximately 1, 125 people, not including the 75-100 visitors each day. The Public Health Commission has expressed concerns to the Commission relative to the closing of this facility. Among the concerns expressed are that due to weight restrictions on the Long Island Bridge, there exists a 20 MPH speed restriction that slows response time. In addition, due to the same weight restrictions, the bridge cannot sustain several pieces of firefighting equipment at once. Further, in the best case scenario, fire department response time from the nearest City station is eleven minutes. Response time from the closest Quincy station is seven minutes. The Commission believes that the increased usage of Long Island by both public and private entities, combined with the inadequate response times from the nearest manned facilities and the lack of effective fire suppression within the buildings, does not justify closing the Long Island Brigade facility. However, the Commission believes that if a continued presence is necessary on Long Island, the station should be treated appropriately for staffing purposes, and it should not be viewed as a "special assignment," and should be subject to the same bidding requirements as any other fire station in the City o Boston.

8.4 Fire Alarm Call Boxes

According to the Boston Finance Commission report, An Analysis of the Boston Fire Department, fire alarm call boxes accounted for 46.9% of all false alarms in 1993 and only 5.7% of all actual reported incidents. According to Department sources, fire alarm call boxes remain one of the main sources for a high rate of false alarms and they are rarely the sole source of an incident call. Extensive use of enhanced 911 and the proliferation of cellular technology suggest that fire alarm call boxes will be of decreasing value in the years to come. These factors raise serious questions regarding the value of maintaining the existing system. The Commission acknowledges the strong arguments against continuing to operate a fire alarm call box network in the City, and we agree that the system as currently in existence is outdated. Nevertheless, after consideration, the Commission defers to the Department's stated desire to maintain the existing call box network at this time. Many Department officials argue that the existing system, which is in good repair, would remain the only communication for neighborhoods in the event of a major catastrophe, such as hurricane or earthquake. This might be some justification to maintain the system, but in order to justify its expense, the City should leverage this network to insure that it is.utilized for the most effective purposes. For example, a project to tie City Hall to the central alarm office in the Fenway is underway which will upgrade the existing copper wire network to fiber-optic cable. Some have proposed a citywide fibre optic network that utilizes the existing fire alarm call box system supporting many City departments. It would be premature to dismantle the system before we understand the possible uses of an upgraded network, and explore the potential for private partnerships that would help to defray the cost of maintenance of the system.

8.5 Recommendations

  • The Commission recommends the maintenance of a station on Long Island staffed according to the same bidding requirements as any other fire station in the City of Boston.

  • The Commission recommends a review of a possible land and water facility on the South Boston waterfront to service significant planned development in that area.

  • The Commission recommends that the City MIS department assume control of the evaluation maintenance and future development of the fire alarm call box network and evaluate all possible technological uses, both public and private.


  • Click here for advertiser information

    © Copyright 2001 Globe Newspaper Company
    Boston Globe Extranet
    Extending our newspaper services to the web
    Return to the home page
    of The Globe Online