![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
A door opens on abuse cases Release of notes on 87 priests is set in motion By Ralph Ranalli, Globe Staff, 5/21/2003
In a one-paragraph decision made public yesterday, Superior Court Judge Constance M. Sweeney ruled that the archdiocese had failed to prove ''in any way'' the existence of a medical or psychiatric privilege that would allow church officials to keep the documents secret. Sweeney ordered the archdiocese to notify all the priests in question that their records are about to be turned over and that they have 15 days to file an objection if they do not want their records revealed. So far, plaintiffs have received psychiatric records for a handful of priests but Sweeney's order potentially paves the way for the release of thousands of pages of new documents to lawyers for alleged abuse victims. Lawyers for the archdiocese had withheld more than 13,000 individual pieces of information from attorneys for the plaintiffs under the claim of doctor-patient or therapist-patient privilege. The information in question comes from mental health specialists who examined allegedly abusive priests at church retreats, mental health institutions, and other facilities. Lawyers for the plaintiffs had urged Sweeney to find that it was not privileged information, arguing that the psychiatric and medical examinations of the 87 priests were obtained by the archdiocese not for the purpose of treating the alleged abuser, but to determine whether the men were fit to continue serving as priests. The records could provide information on whether church officials reassigned priests to active ministry over the objections of psychiatric specialists. The priests in question include: ''One of the critical issues in this case is whether the archdiocese actually listened to the experts that the archdiocese was consulting,'' said Roderick MacLeish, an attorney with the Boston firm Greenberg Traurig, which represents 260 alleged victims of clergy sexual abuse suing the archdiocese. ''These documents will provide us with obviously relevant and important information.'' A spokesman for the archdiocese did not return a call yesterday seeking comment. The release of Sweeney's order came the day after a 90-day voluntary moratorium on pretrial discovery in nearly 400 of the 500 lawsuits ended without a settlement. As the moratorium was expiring, lawyers for the plaintiffs said they saw no alternative to years of difficult litigation against the church. ''Everything is in high gear now,'' one attorney said.
This story ran on page B5 of the Boston Globe on 5/21/2003.
|
|